Skip to main content

News story

October 27, 2017

New Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims

On 1 October 2017, the Pre-action Protocol for Debt Claims came into force, which may have a potentially large impact on businesses owed monies by individuals.

The aim of the Pre-Action Protocol is to encourage early engagement and communication between the parties and to try and enable the parties to resolve matters without the need of issuing court proceedings.

The Pre-Action Protocol applies to any business, whether a limited company, partnership or sole trader, claiming payment of a debt from an individual or sole trader. It does not apply to business-to-business debts, nor if there is another protocol applicable to the matter in dispute.

As part of the process, the Pre-Action Protocol sets out that a creditor must include with its letter before claim a template information sheet and reply form.

The impact of the new regime is that a creditor cannot commence any court proceedings until 30 days have expired since the date of the letter of claim, if the debtor does not reply.

If the debtor asks for more time to obtain debt advice (which they cannot obtain within the 30 days) then a creditor is obliged to allow extra time for the debtor to obtain that advice (where it would be reasonable in the circumstances) before proceedings are issued.

The onus is very much on the creditor to seek to reach an agreement, as it is discouraged from issuing proceedings for at least 30 days from either the date of the letter of claim (if no reply has been received), receipt of a reply to the letter of claim or 30 days from the creditor providing any documents requested by the debtor, whichever is the later.

Ordinarily, it would be prudent to use this time to explore options and to see whether payment by instalments can be agreed. If a settlement is still not possible, it is recommended that the creditor should give a minimum of 14 days’ notice of its intention to commence court proceedings.

For many businesses, particularly small or medium-sized businesses (that rely more heavily on cash flow), the process of recovering debts will become more onerous and time-critical.

The Pre-Action Protocol is designed to favour debtors and places a variety of obligations upon the creditor before proceedings can be issued.

The Pre-Action Protocol allows debtors to take perceived tactical advantages by prolonging the process (by up to 90 days in some cases), which will clearly increase the risks of recovery being diminished in some cases. For example, placing an obligation on a creditor to contact a debtor to put right a defect in the completion of reply forms encourages a lax approach, allowing debtors to do as they wish. The burden then shifts onto the creditor to put right their wrong.

Whilst this latest Pre-Action Protocol, like others, encourages the parties to come to a resolution and obliges the creditor to consider any request for time to pay, there is a twist! A debtor who has prolonged the initial process and then, eventually, agrees to pay by instalments can further hamper the process. This is because, unlike other protocols, the latest Pre-Action Protocol prohibits the immediate issue of proceedings in the event of a debtor not meeting agreed instalments. The creditor is now required to update and resend their letter of claim (essentially restarting the pre-action process again). This is yet another issue a creditor must consider if the debtor’s sole intention is to take advantage of the prevarication the new Pre-Action Protocol may allow.

Whilst in “some” respects the Pre-Action Protocol is merely a reestablishment of existing good practice in dealing with debts, creditors need to take care to ensure compliance whilst taking heed of any perceived tactical advantages a debtor may seek to take to avoid any nasty costs bills.

We recommend businesses review their internal debt and costs control functions, as well as keeping a close check on payment terms, to try and avoid falling foul of the new Pre-Action Protocol and being left in a situation where debts mount and a “clever debtor” can avoid them. The Pre-Action Protocol is designed to favour debtors and expose the creditor to costs for any non-compliance if proceedings are issued prematurely.

Our dispute resolution team is happy to discuss your specific business practices in respect of debt claims and assist you in setting up processes to guide you and ensure compliance with the new Pre-Action Protocol.

For more information, speak to Laura St-Gallay today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend