Skip to main content

News story

February 24, 2017

Vacant properties ‘stolen’ by fraudsters

A recent High Court case, Dreamvar (UK) Ltd -v- Mishcon De Reya (A Firm), demonstrated that the Land Registry could spot a fraudulent transaction.

Back in 2003, the Land Registry stopped issuing Land Certificates, and many property lawyers warned that ‘dematerialisation’ would make life easier for fraudsters.

Sadly, those who predicted going ‘paperless’ and registering the ownership of houses in a similar way to the registration of cars at the DVLA have been proved right, and property fraud is increasing.

A recent High Court case, Dreamvar (UK) Ltd -v- Mishcon De Reya (A Firm), demonstrated that the Land Registry could spot a fraudulent transaction… but only after the ‘purchase’ monies had been transferred to China!

Vacant mortgage-free properties are particularly vulnerable. Fraudsters occupy them, posing as ‘law-abiding tenants’ and then pretending to be the owners of the property. In such cases, the true owner is often an ‘absent landlord’ or one who lives abroad.

It takes a bit of luck as well as savvy to pull off such criminal activities. In the above court case, the property was in London, but the fraudster instructed a firm of solicitors in Manchester to represent him as the ‘seller’.

The Manchester firm did not go far enough with their ID checks and so believed they were representing the property’s true owner. They were also not curious as to why their ‘seller’ client appeared to know so little about his house when they had to reply to enquiries raised by the purchaser’s solicitors.

The fraudster frequently gave good reasons for needing a quick ‘sale’ and said he was going through a nasty divorce and worried that his wife might try to block the proposed sale.

On the day of completion, the Manchester firm transferred the sale proceeds to another firm of solicitors, and from there, approximately £1.1m was transferred to China.

When the Land Registry received the application to register the duped purchaser as the new owner, they spotted a discrepancy which revealed that the ‘sale’ was fraudulent.

The good news is that owners of vacant or tenanted properties should not feel helpless and are able to take steps to make fraud more difficult into their own hands.

The proprietorship register can contain up to four addresses for service for the true owner, including an email address, and the Land Registry offers a Property Alert Service.

This service alerts an owner if an application is made for official copies of the ‘deeds’ or the title register to the property.

Signing up for this service would allow you early on to spot whether your house or flat might be being targeted!

If you’re concerned about fraudulent transactions, speak to John Gillette today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend