Skip to main content

Insight article

December 5, 2016

Dismissing employees with under two years’ service

Risky business?

Generally, employees can only claim unfair dismissal against an employer if they have a minimum of two years’ service. In 2012, the qualifying period increased from one to two years. This presents employers with some level of flexibility in managing and dismissing staff with less than two years’ service.

Employers should be mindful of the start date for new employees and keep an eye out for any concerns. If dissatisfied, it is easier for employers to dismiss employees during the first two years of service (subject to some caveats below).

The minimum

It is sensible to meet with the employee to outline any concerns. Take notes during the meeting. Notes are important because they record what was discussed and are useful if issues arise further down the line. For instance, the employee may be given a short period to improve if the issue is performance-related. If the employer remains unhappy, there is the option to dismiss quickly and efficiently.

It is important to check whether any company policies and procedures are contractually binding. If so, the employer must ensure capability and disciplinary procedures are followed. Ideally, a company’s policies and procedures should not form part of an employment contract since this enables change without consultation.

Exceptions

Employers must exercise caution when contemplating a dismissal. No qualifying length of service is required for a dismissal which is deemed automatically unfair. Examples include dismissal for pregnancy-related reasons, discrimination or acting as a trade union representative. The full list is set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Note an employee whose termination date is the day before the second anniversary of their start date will have two years of service and qualify for an unfair dismissal claim.

Irrespective of unfair dismissal claims, employees can claim wrongful dismissal for breach of contract if the employer does not provide the relevant notice period or makes a payment in lieu of notice. In such cases, fairness is not an issue. The sole question is whether the contract has been breached. Employees are also entitled to be paid for any untaken accrued holiday at the termination date.

Best practice

Employers should follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure. If the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the code, they risk facing a 25% uplift on any compensation. Therefore, a dismissal without notice may be met with an unlawful deduction from wages claim or breach of contract, along with an uplift. A capability termination may be met with a discrimination claim with the risk of an uplift. Employers following the Code add robustness to any claim on an evidential basis.

If you need advice on dismissing an employee, regardless of their length of service, or if you have been dismissed and want advice on your rights, call Karen Cole today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more
  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend