Skip to main content

News story

November 30, 2022

Embarrassing regulation breach for the MoJ

Businesses must ensure they are on the right side of the regulations when it comes to advertising or posting on social media.

The reminder follows the news that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) breached advertising rules when they conducted a recruitment campaign to recruit prison officers.

The photograph used in the advert showed a white prison officer interacting with a black inmate. A complaint was made to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) because the advertisement perpetuated negative ethnic stereotypes.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is the government department which is responsible for the delivery of the country’s justice system, and its stated aim is to “protect and advance the principles of justice… to deliver a world-class justice system that works for everyone in society”.

When challenged over the advertisement, which ran on Facebook for three months earlier this year, the MoJ explained that the photographs used throughout the ad campaign, of which this was one example, featured real officers and prisoners. They argued that there was no intention to portray a black man as a criminal. It was simply one example of a real person who had been convicted of an offence and should be considered across the whole campaign.

The ASA disagreed with the MoJ’s argument, saying the post should be considered as a stand-alone item, as Facebook users would have experienced it. And they decided that the ad was likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race by reinforcing negative stereotypes based on the association between black men and criminal activity.

The ASA is the UK’s independent advertising regulator and is responsible for ensuring that ads across UK media stick to the advertising codes written by the ASA’s sister organisation, the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP).

The advertising codes reflect the law, and the CAP code, which applies to non-broadcast advertisements, sales promotions and direct marketing communications, includes postings on social media.

The MoJ ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 4.1 (Harm and Offence), which requires particular care must be taken to avoid causing offence in relation to those characteristics protected by the Equality Act 2010 and cover: age, disability, gender, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion or belief; sex; and sexual orientation.

In their ruling, the ASA said: We considered the ad’s focus on the positive qualities of the white prison officer and negative casting of the black prisoner was likely to be seen as perpetuating a negative racial stereotype.”

“This ruling demonstrates how important it is to have strong procedures and processes for checking all media activity by an organisation,” said corporate partner Victoria Holland.

She added: “As well as careful checking of advertising and direct marketing campaigns which may be developed by external agencies, commercial organisations need to have clear guidelines and control over their entire social media output.

“It’s not just paid-for content that falls under ASA guidelines, as they also oversee all social media postings, whether on Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram or elsewhere, making this a minefield to manage whether delivered internally or externally.”

Contact our corporate department today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend