EB1 Multinational Manager/Executive Green Card via an L1A Intracompany Transfer Visa

What is an L-1A visa?

The L-1A intracompany transfer non-immigrant visa allows foreign national executive/managerial employees located outside the U.S. to work in the U.S. for an affiliated entity.  An L-1A visa is a non-immigrant status and does not automatically give the foreign employee permanent residency or a “green card”.  But it may in certain circumstances be a very useful gateway for a green card.

What is the EB-1C Multinational Manager/Executive?

The Employment-Based Immigration Petition, or EB-1C green card, is an employment-based petition for permanent residence.  The EB-1C was designed for the most proficient and skilled foreign managers and executives.  Some of the EB-1C criteria are similar to those of an L-1A visa.  Persons who come to the U.S. as L1A workers can usually apply for an EB-1C green card after being in the U.S. for one year on the L1A status, provided they are not also an owner of the business.  In some cases qualified L1A executives/managers can apply for EB-1C green cards prior to the one year anniversary of their L1A status, if the U.S. entity has been operational for over a year.

L-1A Visas – The Intracompany Transfer

Basic Requirements L-1A

For the Employee (Alien) to be eligible for an L-1A non-immigrant visa, the following conditions must be met:

  • The employee must have worked abroad for the overseas company for a continuous period of one year in the preceding three years.-The company for which the employee has worked for a year abroad must be related to the U.S. company in a specific manner.
  • The sponsoring company must be doing business both in the United States and another country throughout the period of the transfer.  Or the employee must be opening a startup in the U.S.
  • The employee to be transferred must have been employed abroad in an “executive” or “managerial” position.
  • The employer must be coming to the U.S. company to fill one of these capacities (executive or managerial).
  • The employee must be qualified for the position by virtue of his or her prior education and experience.
  • The L-1A alien must intend to depart the United States upon completion of his or her authorized stay (including extensions) but may also pursue permanent residence at the same time.

One-year Continuous Employment Requirement

The one-year continuous employment requirement gives rise to several questions.

  • Does the petitioner have to meet the one-year requirement within three years immediately preceding to filing the L-1A petition or entry into the United States or initial application for entry into the United States?
  • The statutes and regulations are unclear and contradicting on this issue. Reading the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) on its face, the statute refers to the 3 years preceding the time of application for admission into the United States.  Following this interpretation, the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) defines intracompany transferee as “an alien who, within three years preceding the time of his or her application for admission into the United States, has been employed abroad continuously for one year” by a qualifying company.[1] However, later in the same section, the CFR provides contradicting interpretation, stating that L-1A petition need to be supported by evidence that “the alien has at least one continuous year of full-time employment abroad with a qualifying organization within the three years preceding the filing of the petition”.[2]
  • In Matter of Kloeti, the court looked at the beneficiary employee’s initial application for entry into the United States.[3] The beneficiary first applied for admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor for business (B-1); he then applied to change status to L-1. The court said that his application for change of status is not an application for admission to the United States under INA section 101(a)(15)(L).  As the beneficiary had not employed for one year by the qualifying overseas company before his B-1 visitor application, he did not meet the one-year employment requirement for L-1 petition.
  • The INS (USCIS) discussed that if a beneficiary works in the U.S. on H-1B visa before filing for L-1 and the H-1B is related to the qualifying foreign employer, they count the qualifying employment time prior to the H-1B application when considering the one-year employment requirement.[4] The INS provides a scenario where a beneficiary has worked in the U.S. for 3 years on H-1B nonimmigrant visa before filing for L-1. The INS officer says that for the L-1 petition, they consider whether the beneficiary has acquired one-year of qualifying employment within three years immediately preceding his H-1B application. The INS requires, however, that “the time spent in the U.S. as an H-1B be for a firm related in a qualifying capacity to the alien’s previous foreign employer.”[5]
  • If the employee gets work-related training in the U.S. for a few months, does the training break his/her continuous employment at the overseas company?
  • In Matter of Continental Grain, the foreign national stayed in the U.S. for 28 months as a nonimmigrant trainee in pursuit of further training related to his qualifying employment.[6] Within the twelve months immediately preceding his petition, the beneficiary had spent over four months in the United States. He had worked at his overseas company for over 5 months immediately preceding the training and immediately after the training, he worked there for more than 7 months. Under such circumstances, the foreign national met the one-year continuous employment requirement. (This case was decided before the current L-1 regulations came in force. “Periods spent in the United States in lawful status for a branch of the same employer or a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary thereof and brief trips to the United States for business or pleasure shall not be interruptive of the one year of continuous employment abroad but such periods shall not be counted towards fulfillment of that requirement.”[7]

EB-1C GREEN CARD – Multinational Executives and Managers

EB-1C stands for the first preference employment-based immigrant classification for multinational executives or manages. This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity.

In order to establish eligibility for EB-1C, the employee must have worked for a qualifying entity abroad for one year in the three years preceding the filing of the petition or preceding his or her admission to work for the petitioner as a non-immigrant.  If the beneficiary is outside the United States at the time of filing, the petitioner must demonstrate that the beneficiary’s one year of qualifying foreign employment occurred within the three years immediately preceding the filing of the petition.[8] If the beneficiary is already working in the United States for the petitioner, or its affiliate or subsidiary, at the time of filing, the petitioner must demonstrate that the beneficiary’s year of foreign employment occurred in the three years preceding his or her entry as a non-immigrant.[9]

In its recent Policy Memorandum issued on March 19, 2018, USCIS states that for the one-in-three employment requirement, it only looks at the three years immediately preceding the EB-1C petition. A period of employment with a different U.S. employer would not automatically disqualify a beneficiary. However, a break in qualifying employment longer than two years will interrupt a beneficiary’s continuity of employment with the petitioner’s multinational organization. Such breaks may include, but are not limited to, intervening employment with a non-qualifying U.S. employer or periods of stay in a non-immigrant status without work authorization.

Please consult RIAA Barker Gillette (USA) on issues related to L-1A or EB-1C petitions.

Note: This is not legal advice; it is intended to provide information of
general interest about current legal issues.

[1] 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(1)(ii)(A).

[2] 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(3)(iii).

[3] See Matter of Kloeti, 18 I&N Dec. 295 (Reg’l Comm’r 1982).

[4] Letter, Bednarz, Chief, NIV Branch Adjudications, CO 214 L-C (Mar. 25, 1994), reprinted in 71 No. 27 Interpreter Releases 936, 938 (July 18, 1994).

[5] Id.

[6] See Matter of Continental Grain, 14 I&N Dec. 140 (D.D. 1972)

[7] 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(1)(ii)(A).

[8] 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(3)(i)(A).

[9] See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(3)(i)(B).

Contacts

Mohammad Ali Syed

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch
Sending

Global news/insight

  • RIAA Barker Gillette (USA) Supports the Expansion of Leading BVI Law Firm O’Neal Webster into New York by Successful L-1A Intracompany Transfer Visa Application
    RIAA Barker Gillette (USA) is pleased to announce its success in assisting O’Neal Webster, a premier British Virgin Islands law firm, in the establishment of its New York City office—the first BVI law firm to stake a physical presence in the city [...]

    Read more
  • Fresh guidance on L-1 visa petitions
    USCIS clarifies proxy vote use for certain intra-company transferee L-1 visa petitions [...]

    Read more
  • Deadlines for H-1B work visas for next year
    Coming soon! [...]

    Read more
  • Top questions asked by business
    immigration practitioners in the
    trump era

    Live Broadcast on April 7, 2017 [...]

    Read more
  • What foreign lawyers need to know
    about US immigration law changes

    Seminar and telecon on April 4, 2017 [...]

    Read more
  • RIAA Barker Gillette contributes to IFC Solar Developer’s Guidebook
    [...]

    Read more
  • RIAA Baker Gillette launches in the Middle East
    [...]

    Read more
  • Rules for shareholders’ protection fund approved
    Islamabad [...]

    Read more
  • CGT on securities increased for non-filers
    Karachi [...]

    Read more
  • Non-resident companies: FBR issues separate procedures/conditions
    The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has made it mandatory for non-resident companies (having no Permanent Establishment in Pakistan) to be registered to provide tax registration or incorporation document from relevant regulatory authorities of the for [...]

    Read more
  • E-2 visa update
    Law Firm wins approval of non-immigrant E-2 status for Korean business investor [...]

    Read more
  • Income tax exemption limit to be increased
    Islamabad [...]

    Read more
  • Company law changes in 2016
    Company Law Changes in 2016 - The Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 Note: The requirement to keep a PSC register came into force on 6 April 2016. [...]

    Read more
  • Company law changes in 2016
    Company Law Changes in 2016 - The Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 Note: The requirement to keep a PSC register came into force on 6 April 2016. [...]

    Read more
  • RICS arbitration service launched
    RICS arbitration service for construction and engineering disputes [...]

    Read more
  • The Bribery Act 2010
    In January 2016 the first UK company to be prosecuted for corruption was sentenced to a fine of just over £1.3m, had over £800k confiscated and was ordered to pay £25k in prosecution costs; with two directors being convicted and sentenced (in 2015 [...]

    Read more
  • Implied terms
    The Supreme Court has recently clarified the law on implied terms in Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd. [...]

    Read more
  • Investor Alert
    Investment Scams Exploit Immigrant Investor Program [...]

    Read more
  • RIAALAW and Barker Gillette LLP merge to give global reach
    The formation of RIAA Barker Gillette ushers in a whole new era for both firms. [...]

    Read more

What clients say...

undefined
undefined
I have worked directly with Mo on multiple cases, so I have seen his legal analysis and skills first-hand. I highly recommend him.

Bryan Pieper Lawyer: 12 June 2015

Mo is a remarkable guy — Engaging, personable, and intelligent, with life experience that makes him a great choice to represent both international clients and American clients with international business or legal matters.

Bryan Pieper: Lawyer : 12 June 2015

He is an expert on immigration law including L1 intra company transfer visas

Sebastián Baglietto: Grupo Peñaflor: 15 October 2015

Mohammad is a great deadline oriented, ambitious and eager Lawyer who can be trusted.

Sebastián Baglietto: Grupo Peñaflor: 15 October 2015

I’ve had the privilege of working with Mohammad A. Syed since January 2015 and in that time I have known Mo to be a well-grounded and down to earth.

Sebastián Baglietto: Grupo Peñaflor: 15 October 2015

Mohammad is very professional and has successfully assisted us. I would highly recommend hiring his legal services to anyone seeking to develop business within the US market and for top quality immigration representation.

Victoria Mingo: Regional Export Manager USA, Bodegas Trapiche: 17 November 2015

I had the pleasure of benefiting from Mohammad’s legal services. He was assigned to set up our company in the US and advise us in all legal matters and secured an L1 intracompany visa for us.

Victoria Mingo: Regional Export Manager USA, Bodegas Trapiche: 17 November 2015

I highly recommend Mohammad Ali Syed for immigration law, especially for EB1 permanent residence applications. Science Program Lead at U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

Shikha Tandon: Olympian: 8 December 2015

Throughout the EB1 process, Mo Syed and his team were easy to work with and were always just a phone call away!

Shikha Tandon: Olympian: 8 December 2015

The EB1 category has very stringent standards and it was imperative to provide as much evidence as possible under the different criteria. Mohammad Ali Syed helped me understand the different criteria so that I could provide relevant documents as supporting evidence.

Shikha Tandon: Olympian: 8 December 2015

Mohammad Ali Syed assisted me in successfully obtaining my Green Card through the EB1 category (for aliens of extraordinary ability). My accomplishments include swimming for India at the Olympics and working for the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

Shikha Tandon: Olympian: 8 December 2015

He is an expert in litigation, dispute resolution and international business. I’d recommend him in a flash.

Shakir Husain: Partner, IVM Capital: 9 December 2015

Mo has a robust extended network which he has leveraged for us when needed and we’re very grateful for the advice and work he’s done for us.

Shakir Husain: Partner, IVM Capital: 9 December 2015

Mo has been an excellent legal sounding board and has helped through a diverse set of problems that we've experienced as a business.

Shakir Husain: Partner, IVM Capital: 9 December 2015

He is an expert in immigration and nationality law. I would recommend him without hesitation.

Rahila Passi: PTA President, Sandpiper Elementary: 9 December 2015

Mohammad Ali Syed is a results oriented lawyer who had the knowledge of the system to follow the proper procedures and the connections to keep pushing my case through…

Rahila Passi: PTA President, Sandpiper Elementary: 9 December 2015

“Large and well-reputed practice”

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

“RIAA’s banking and finance department is noted for its ‘vast experience’ and ‘strong track record’”

Tier 1: IFLR1000 2015

“Our relationship with the firm started 20 years ago and we have never looked back.”

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

“They really take the time to listen to the case.”

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

“I only use RIAA and no other firm in Pakistan – I have the utmost regard for them.”

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

’Strong’ litigation department”.

The Legal 500 : Asia Pacific 2015

’Renowned’ corporate practice”

Tier 1: IFLR1000 2015

RIAA is ‘strong on telecoms-related work’, and has acted on for a number of high-profile clients in this sector.

Legal 500: 2015

RIAA’s ‘experienced’ tax department is praised as ‘top notch’. It is advising several multinational corporate clients on tax structuring to minimise fiscal exposure in Pakistan. Ahsan Rizvi leads on tax mandates.

Legal 500: 2015

RIAA has provided environmental advice on a number of domestic projects.

Legal 500: 2015

RIAA’s ‘strong’ litigation department advised Clariant Chemical and Clariant International on a High Court dispute, and is also acting for K-Electric on a constitutional matter.

Legal 500: 2015

RIAA’s ‘exceptionally good’ practice is ‘always available’ and ‘has excellent knowledge of the energy sector’.

Legal 500: 2015

Highlights for RIAA’s ‘renowned’ corporate practice included advising Unisys International on the sale of its majority shareholding in Unisys Pakistan to International Brands Limited.

Legal 500: 2015

"We have a very positive relationship with them. They are proactive, down-to-earth, thorough and extremely knowledgeable when finding solutions."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

"I have the utmost regard for the firm; they are first class."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

"They have vast experience of the power sector, and always provide alternative solutions to problems - they really take ownership of the projects they are working on."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

What the team is known for: Active on a wide range of conventional and renewable projects, including notable activity on the conversion of power plants to coal.

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

What the team is known for: Offers high levels of expertise in the power sector, advising the sponsors on development, financing and regulatory issues.

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Ahsan Zahir Rizvi keeps things on an even keel and so people trust him, even those on the other side."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Sources highlight Ahsan Zahir Rizvi’s strong negotiation capabilities, with one noting: "He can see the other side's perspective, that is his greatest strength.

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Ahsan Zahir Rizvi is held in high regard for his depth of expertise in the power sector.

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Ahsan Zahir Rizvi is also praised for "his precision in giving advice. He is very to the point."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Senior partner Ahsan Zahir Rizvi is one of Pakistan's most highly reputed transactional lawyers: "He is one of the most individually outstanding people, both from a commercial point of view and a legal point of view."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

"RIAA has a very strong reputation for handling commercial and corporate matters."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

"They have been absolutely outstanding. I don't think there is a team more dedicated."

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

Excellent bench of practitioners with a full-service corporate offering. Often mandated on big-ticket M&A deals, particularly for corporations in the energy and power sectors.

Chambers: Asia Pacific 2015

RBG provides notable expertise across the full spectrum of contentious and non-contentious banking matters, and counts numerous financial institutions among its clients. On the borrower side, the team has experience representing companies in the power, energy and transport sectors.

Legal 500: 2016

The firm has an active transactional practice and is instructed by clients across the energy, telecoms, financial services and construction sectors. Complementary expertise in tax, employment and competition benefits a practice covering mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, joint ventures and privatisations.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette’s disputes department handles cases spanning constitutional, employment, trade mark, energy and family law.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette maintains an active energy practice, where it advises clients on compliance and liability under environmental law, and assists with licensing and regulatory approvals.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette receives instructions from insurance company clients in relation to both contentious and non-contentious matters. Past work includes handling corporate transactions and international arbitrations.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette advises on corporate and commercial agreements relating to power, water and construction projects, and is becoming increasingly involved in matters concerning wind and other renewables.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette’s longstanding experience in the construction sector, with past work including the construction and development of hospitals and various power and infrastructure projects. Acquisitions, sales, transfers and property leasing are other mainstays, as is project finance…

Legal 500: 2016

In the media space, the team has experience in licensing, and advises radio, television and print clients on operational matters.

Legal 500: 2016

Telecoms is an area of strength at RIAA Barker Gillette, with the team providing expertise in corporate, commercial and regulatory matters.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette advises multinational corporate clients on tax structuring and restructuring. It is also active in tax litigation and appeals before the High Court.

Legal 500: 2016

RIAA Barker Gillette…"It is a powerhouse."

Chambers Guide: Asia-Pacific 2016

Renowned for his expertise in the power sector, peers highlight Ahsan Zahir Rizvi as "one of the most experienced projects lawyers in Pakistan."

Chambers: Global Guide 2016

Ahsan Zahir Rizvi continues to be revered by market commentators, who single him out for his "sharp legal mind."

Chambers: Global Guide 2016

Ahsan Zahir Rizvi is singled out by clients for the depth of his transactional experience and for "bringing a colour and vibrancy to the table."

Chambers: Global Guide 2016

Sources describe Ahsan Zahir Rizvi as "an exceptional practitioner" and "a backbone of the firm."

Chambers: Global Guide 2016

About us